Dave von Fintel

Filmmaker/Photographer specializing in Aerial Cinematography


  • Filmmaker specializing in Aerial Cinematography2014 - Present

    Kansas City, MO

    I'm taking my creative skills to new heights - piloting a UAV to produce dramatic aerial video/photo solutions as well as producing & editing conventional video for a variety of industries.

  • Freelance Creative Director2012 - 2014


  • Web Development Director2004 - 2012

    Rockhurst University

  • Creative Director1999 - 2004

    Rockhurst University

  • Art Director1998 - 1999

    Rockhurst University

  • Graphic Designer1997 - 1998

    GB Design


  • Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA), Graphic Design1991 - 1996

    University of Missouri

  • Graphic Design, Photography & Video Production1995 - 1996

    University of Tasmania School of Art, Australia


  • “Dave has exceptional skills as a designer and web developer. As his supervisor for several years, I found him to be a joy to work with, and a great team player. He is a problem-solver who finds a solution to every challenge. I would not hesitate to hire him again.”

    Rosita McCoy, Senior VP - KU Endowment Association

  • “I’ve had the pleasure of working with Dave on many projects. He’s always able to bring a fresh perspective to every job. His positive personality and openness to trying new things, makes working with him a very fun & collaborative event.”

    Mark McDonald, Owner - Mark McDonald Photography

  • “I worked with Dave for several years while employed at gb Design. Dave and I collaborated on a variety of design projects and I always found him to be easy to work with and valued the ideas and professionalism he brought to the table. Since that time, my agency has had the pleasure to work with Dave and his team at Rockhurst as a vendor providing online development solutions and consulting to Rockhurst University. Dave continues to provide impressive direction and management skills to the projects we have conducted with him and his team.”

    Ryan Lorei, Owner - Voltage Creative

  • “In the seven years Dave and I worked together, I watched him consistently come up with effective, creative solutions for various print, web and video projects. He stays on top of design trends and web standards, and everything he touches looks refined and professional. He has exceptional talent and lots of ideas, which made him a valuable member of our team.”

    Jamie Swearingen, UX Copywriter - Garmin International

  • “I have hired Dave may times for his expert graphic design services, and have also brought him in as a consultant on several high profile web design and development projects. Dave's ability to listen to my client's needs, and his ability to translate their ideas into reality are second to none.”

    Matt Couch, Real Estate Analyst - Hopkins Appraisal Services


  • • CASE (Council for Advancement and Support of Education): Silver Award
- '09, Excellence in Multimedia: Single Web Page (Ready for Rockhurst) 
- Bronze - '02, Rockhurst University Alumni Magazine 
- Silver - '01, Rockhurst University Alumni Magazine
 - Gold - '00, Rockhurst University Alumni Magazine Cover 
- Silver - '00, Rockhurst University Campus Banners 
• Web Marketing Association's Web Awards Judge - '08 
• JAA (Jesuit Advancement Administrators): '06 - Award of Merit: Multimedia, Admission Pages 
• Internet Advertising Competition '05 - Best Education Integrated Ad Campaign - Rockhurst Website 
• Center for Digital Education: '05 Best of the Web 2nd place, Rockhurst University 
• Web Marketing Association: '05 Best Education Internet Advertising Award, Rockhurst University 
• American Association of Webmasters: '04 Silver Award, Rockhurst University 
• Mead Papers: Certificate of Excellence in the Graphic Arts - Rockhurst University, 1999 Annual Report

Visit Instagram/davevonfintel for frequently updated shots. Some of my work features footage that may be purchased as stock video or photo.


Let's Connect

New research Aids Evolutionary Psychologyaˆ™s Reason Why Women And Men Need Different Characteristics In Associates

Regarding the hot topic of differences when considering just how women and men react, discussion in mindset features devoted to spouse tastes and common welfare. For basic passion, guys are more interested in physical points, while ladies are keen on visitors.

Even staunchest evolutionary psychologists would admit they’re partly overlapping bell figure: There are plenty of guys who are fascinated by other folks, and plenty of females shopping for physical beauty in someone most of all. The conclusions have been satisfied with intense opposition in a number of quarters. One of the most innovative rejoinders is called personal functions idea: the distinctions create exist, nonetheless’re entirely or largely the result of sex roles imposed by society on people. But new research released as a preprint at PsyArXiv and involving individuals from 36 countries have did not duplicate a key discovering that’s previously already been reported meant for social parts concept.

In its purest kind personal roles idea is seen as sitting at the Nurture end of a Nature/Nurture spectrum, relating to which gender differences in conduct develop through social customs. During the characteristics end, on the other hand, tend to be different evolutionary psychology profile which posit that gender differences in actions comprise created into destination by evolution. Definitely, since copy suggests this type of different things for men and women aˆ“ males can pass on their genes at very little aˆ?cost,aˆ? while for females this includes pregnancy and childbearing at least aˆ“ gents and ladies bring evolved different needs for mates.

But the fresh analyses match up, no less than partly, with the ones from a significant 2010 post posted by Richard Lippa , which requested a similar collection of inquiries with respect to intercourse differences in character and passion

Perhaps one of the most noteworthy reports printed in support of personal functions theory came out in American Psychologist in 1999. Alice H. Eagly and Wendy material reinterpreted facts originally printed of the evolutionary psychologist David Buss (showing ordinary gender differences in partner choice across societies) as well as reported that in nations with more egalitarian sex interaction, the male-female distinctions comprise more compact. This suggested that gender equivalence offers women room to follow her true passionate and sexual tastes, which aren’t all those things far-off from males’.

However, for your brand-new preprint, Lingshan Zhang and Benedict Jones, in addition to their colleagues within institution of Glasgow, have actually presented the exact same questions relating to spouse tastes to a new sample (this package featuring 910 guys and 2350 females from 36 region, every one of whom had placed several qualities in couples from most to least important, or rated those same qualities numerically, or both) as well as their assessment casts significant question regarding the skill of social functions concept to describe these disparities.

The authors clarify that in aˆ?contrast with Eagly and material (1999), whom made use of aggregated data to assess sex-difference score at nation levels, we put multilevel products to investigate the lover choices for specific participants,aˆ? and so they point out two researches which argue, within their phrase, that aˆ?the second means is preferable as it takes into account variability in choices within each nation.aˆ? (in every three researches aˆ“ Buss; Eagly and Wood; while the latest research aˆ“ members done exactly the same work, so it is an apples-to-apples-to-apples contrast because good sense.)

Zhang along with his group found, as per her abstract, that aˆ?Although ladies chosen friends with close receiving capability over people did and guys recommended actually appealing mates over lady did, we discover little facts these intercourse variations had been small in countries with greater gender equivalence,aˆ? as explained by United Nations data. There is aˆ?one evaluation [which] advised your sex difference in tastes once and for all receiving capacity got more compact in region with greater sex equality, [but] this influence was not big whenever regulating for Galton’s complications or whenever correcting for multiple evaluations.aˆ? Galton’s issue is a statistical mistake that may occur whenever dealing with points as statistically independent that actually are not aˆ“ in cases like this, cultural practices in region which happen to be in near geographic proximity together.

Ultimately, after controlling for Galton’s issue, the experts discovered https://datingranking.net/daddyhunt-review/ only one lover quality that’s been the topic of some evo-psych theorising aˆ“ home-based skills like preparing and washing aˆ“ that the formerly documented better appeal to men than girls successfully gone away much more sex equal region. Someplace else, though, the difference were strong, both in the rated- and rated-trait facts, actually regulating for sex equivalence.

In terms of ideas on how to understand these latest conclusions, Benedict Jones aˆ“ co-author throughout the newer preprint aˆ“ clarified on Twitter that aˆ?the jobs does not eliminate social functions playing a job in mate preferencesaˆ? which aˆ?we don’t provide any direct facts for evolutionary explanations of partner needs and some of our own recent perform has pushed all of them. It really is complex!aˆ?

Summarising aˆ?two meta-analyses and three cross-cultural researches on sex variations in personality and welfare,aˆ? Lippa discovered aˆ?smallaˆ? to aˆ?moderateaˆ? gender differences pertaining to gigantic Five personality traits, but aˆ?very largeaˆ? your pertaining to the personaˆ“thing separate. aˆ?Gender variations in individuality commonly large in gender-egalitarian communities than in gender-inegalitarian societies,aˆ? the guy found, aˆ?a finding that contradicts social character idea it is in keeping with evolutionary, attributional, and personal evaluation theories. Compared, gender variations in welfare be seemingly regular across countries as well as opportunity, a finding that shows possible biologic affects.aˆ?

At the least, Lippa’s research and new one from Zhang and Jones et al allow more complicated for advocates of social parts theory to spell out what’s going on. If intercourse variations in spouse appeal are as easy as aˆ?Men are conditioned to seek out attractive people, and people to seek out high-earning men,aˆ? you might expect gender equality having some effect on that dynamic. Character and nurture undoubtedly intertwine and connect in wide variety options humans may never ever totally disentangle, but for now these brand-new information succeed harder, according to Lippa, to rule out a powerful part for aˆ?biologic shapes.aˆ?

The available research shows whenever considering (heterosexual) mating tastes, guys are fairly more interested in real charm, while women can be fairly interested in getting capacity

-Are gender variations in choices for actual elegance and good getting capability in prospective friends modest in nations with higher gender equivalence? [this study is a preprint for example it offers not yet become peer evaluated additionally the last type may differ from the one that this document had been predicated on]

Blog post authored by Jesse Singal () your BPS analysis process. Jesse are a contributing writer at BPS analysis consume and nyc journal, and he posts his or her own newsletter featuring behavioral-science-talk. He or she is additionally concentrating on a novel about the reason why poor behavioral-science states often get viral for Farrar, Straus and Giroux.